INLTV Uncensored Independent News

INLTV is Easy To Find Hard To Leave

 

Their is a New Home Page for INLTV.co.uk Old Home Page  had thousnds of Internet Hits .

The Hit Counter has started again wigth the creation of this new www.INLTV.co.uk Home Page

To provide a story, opinion, comment or video to be

uploaded to this. site please feel free to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

My blog – Just another WordPress site (dublinfringefest.com)

http://youtubeexposed.com/

http://googleexposed.com/

http://www.wikipediaexposed.org/home.html

https://inltv.co.uk/index.php/the-covid-scamdemic

https://inltv.co.uk/index.php/covidvaccinedeaths

 

http://googleexposed.com/veri_id_chip/

http://googleexposed.com/committee-of-300/

http://googleexposed.com/microwave_mindcontrol/

 

Dublin International Online Fringe Festival

Email Log In Link for DublinFringeFest.com

September 2021

​​​​​​​​​Email Log In Link for INLTV.co.uk

Handy​ Easy Email and World News Links  WebMail

GoogleSearch GMail YahooMail    HotMail   AOLMail  

AustralianDailyNews   wikipedia.org 

 Facebook   Twitter WikiLeaks   INLNews   rt.com  AWNNews   YahooMail    HotMail   

GMail  AOLMail  bahai.org 

  themindunleashed.com   vice.com  kanalukraina.tv 

RussianNews-themoscowtimes.com   RussiaBeyond   rt.com  

USAMAIL   MyWayEmail   EuropeanNews TheList.com   gossip.whyfame   

crikey.com.au  tsarizm.com  zergnet.com CDMedia ReutersNewsVideos   CNNWorld   

JapaneseNews   VestiNews 

IsraelVideoNews NewYorkTimes   BBCNews  TheTimesUK   c-span.org   icepop.com

WashingtonPostNews   WashingtonTimesNews  ChinaDailyNews   AdelaideNews  

The Guardian-News  ABCAustralianNews   reason.com    reason.com/video 

NewZealandNews   USADailyNews   Indian News   Queensland News    

Melbourne News    SydneyNews-SydneyMorningHerald     DarwinNews

SydneyDailyNews-Daily Telegraph  truthwiki.org  themindunleashed.com  aljazeera.com  spyurk.am

WesternAustralianNews  wikipediocracy.com   tcij.org  aljazeera.com/investigations  

hindustantimes

​spiked-online.com-humanity is underrated  TheVerge   The Truth Factory   newsfollowup.com

encyclopediadramatica.rs  themarysue.com  huffpost  consciouslifenews.com  

collective-evolution.com

INLNews Sponsored Website Log in Link   rightsinfo.org   Progressive.org  www.vox.com 

forensic-architecture.org   www.c-span.org   wikispooks.com  newint.org   progressive.org

​Popular-Amazing-WILD-AnimalEncounters-FailCompilations-awn.bz  

www.rawstory.com  counterpunch.org   

collective-evolution.com   

theduran.com  truthdig.com  

 LibertyNews

Please Help Support Independent Media. and Freedom of the Press by clicking on this website a couple of times a day .... either for the news and information on this website and/or the great handy easy email and world news links rather than going to the home page of the email address you use to find the email log in page or news page

It may have something to do with the fact that this video accuses to the CIA and other powerful elite of being in control of much of the content presented to the general public in the mainsteam media, films and television.

 

" The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the Major Media.." ....Former CIA Director William Colby 

Quotes of the Month
“What happened to Kennedy is nearly what happened to me. America is in danger of upheavals. But you'll see. All of them together will observe the law of silence. They will close ranks. They'll do everything to stifle the scandal. They will throw Noah's cloak over these shameful deeds. In order to not lose face in front of the whole world. In order to not risk unleashing riots in the United States. In order to preserve the union and to avoid a new civil war. In order to not ask themselves questions. They don't want to know. They don't want to find out. They won't allow themselves to find out."
~ French president after returning to Paris from JFK's funeral on November 24th, 1963 (Peyrefitte's memoir in "It Was de Gaulle")
- Charles de Gaulle
I never make the same mistake twice ...I make it like five or six times, you  know .....just to be sure
I am currently under construction .. thank you for your patience

 

The PCR Tests, the COVID-19 Pandemic and the COVID-19 Vaccines is simply the largest fraud in human civilization history. 

Dr. Kary Mullis Inventor Of the PCR Test Part One

"I suspect that the “PCR test” was intentionally chosen for its potential non-specificity. It can be a very useful technique for those wishing to control, mislead, impoverish and eliminate us as it is so easy to manipulate its protocol to suit different purposes. It is an ideal tool to perpetrate massive deceptions."

Dr. Kary Mullis

Nobel Prize Winner In Chemistry

Nobel Prize Motivation: For his invention of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Method

Born: 28th December, 1944, Lenor, NC, USA

Died: 7th August, 2009, Port Beach, CA, USA 

Kary Mullis explained "the PCR Test was not designed to be used for testing for the existence of a live virus in the body..... if you use th PCR Test you can find anything you are looking for depending on how high magnification level use turn the PCR Test up to..."

The Claimed Whole HIV-Aids Connection Was A Hoax

Kary Mullis  discovered that the CDC (Centre For Disease Control) were losing money and that the HIV-AIDS connection was a massive scam, which was used to bring the CDC's from a loss to a profit and the men on the highest levels were in on it. Kary Mullis  knew that these men were extremely dangerous and that they didn't want people like Kary Mullis walking in and asking these sports of questions .. that they were willing to go to any lengths to stop his making waves and asking embarrassing questions .... that these dangerous powerful men were willing to go to great lengths to prevent that...

VaccinesRevealed_Eps2_P2_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_Int2 - 1of6

Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Andrew Wakefield Interviews.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman was fired from his medical job for refusing to wear a mast

VaccinesRevealed_Eps2_P2_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_Int2-P2of6

VaccinesRevealed_Eps2_P2_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_Int2-P3of6

VaccinesRevealed_Eps2_P2_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_Int2-P4of6

VaccinesRevealed_Eps2_P2_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_Int2-P5of6

VaccinesRevealed_Eps2_P2_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_Int2-P6of6

Vaccines Revealed Episode 2 Part 2 Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Andrew Wakefield Interview Two Talks about the non existent COVID-19 Virus and  Fraudulent PCR Tests with False Positives to fraudulently record non COVID-19 Deaths as COVID-19 Deaths an fraudulently create large COVID-19 Infections as an excuse for wrongful and illegal lockdowns destroying small and medium size business and help larger businesses owned by the Ruling Elite to increase in value and turnover creating many more billionaires through owing shares in COVID-19 Vaccines Companies and making many more billions through their existing businesses 

Note the PCR test is the weak link in this Crime Against Humanity it is easily shown scientifically to not detect an active SARS-Cov-2 infection

“More than 16000 scientists and doctors, as well as more than 150,000 people have signed the Great Barrington Declaration, opposing a second COVID-19 lockdown because, according to them, it’s doing much more harm than good.”   Great Barrington Declaration
At this point in time, 10 Oct 2020, it is totally clear what we are dealing with in COVID-19 is NOT a Health Emergency. We are dealing with The Largest Crime in Human History.
    

  • The total DAMAGE from Government policy far EXCEEDS, by many times, the damage from the health consequences from COVID-19
  • We are basing our government policy, our economic policy and are restricting our basic human rights on completely wrong data and assumptions on the corona virus. If it were not for the “test results” that are daily reported in the corrupt MSM then it would be over because basically nothing really happened.
  • Do the so called anti-corona measures such as the lockdowns, face masks, social distancing and quarantining serve to protect the world’s population from corona or do they serve other agendas? Item one on the agenda it to create FEAR.
  • The anti-corona measures whose only basis is the incorrect PCR test have harmed innumerable human lives and have destroyed the economic existence of countless companies and individuals world wide.
  • The PCR Test is being used used on the basis of false statements by highly placed health authorities, not based on scientific facts with respect to infection.
  • A positive PCR Test does not mean any infection in present in the person tested. About 90% of positive tests are FALSE POSITIVES with no SARS-CoV-2 infection present in the tested person.
  • The test information coming with the PCR test kits state they are not to be used for diagnostic purposes. The CDC states the same thing, as does the inventor of the PCR method Doctor Mullis.
  • The mortality of corona is equivalent to that of the seasonal flu,
  • COVID-19 has not caused any excess morality anywhere in the world.
  • The German Government was massively lobbied by by the world’s Big Health Care establishment?
  • The German Government’s Interior Dept has published a report stating the population was deliberately driven to panic by politicians and the media. The honest person responsible for this important report was FIRED by the German government. This show the corruption and crimes includes the German government. This firing of honest people for speaking truth about CON-19 is occurring in large entities all over the world.
  • Our, we the people, only out of this CON-19 is to LOSE our FEAR of CON-19 and call out all the clowns promoting this FEAR. The best way to begin to do this is to learn a little about the fraudulent “PCR test”. All else will follow;

 Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi states COVID-19 Vaccines are the biggest most
Dangerous Criminal Experiment Perpetuated 0n-Humans_Part 2a
 

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Talking About PCR Tests Showing False COVID-19 Positives

Part 1 of 4 from DelingPod

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Talking About PCR Tests Showing False COVID-19 Positives

Part 2 of 4 from DelingPod

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Talking About PCR Tests Showing False COVID-19 Positives

Part 3 of 4 from DelingPod

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Talking About PCR Tests Showing False COVID-19 Positives

Part 4 of 4 from DelingPod

 PCR Tests The Truth Exposed Part One 
 
 PCR Tests The Truth Exposed Part Two
 

Note the PCR test is the weak link in this Crime Against Humanity it is easily shown scientifically to not detect an active SARS-Cov-2 infection

“More than 16000 scientists and doctors, as well as more than 150,000 people have signed the Great Barrington Declaration, opposing a second COVID-19 lockdown because, according to them, it’s doing much more harm than good.”   Great Barrington Declaration
At this point in time, 10 Oct 2020, it is totally clear what we are dealing with in COVID-19 is NOT a Health Emergency. We are dealing with The Largest Crime in Human History.
    

  • The total DAMAGE from Government policy far EXCEEDS, by many times, the damage from the health consequences from COVID-19
  • We are basing our government policy, our economic policy and are restricting our basic human rights on completely wrong data and assumptions on the corona virus. If it were not for the “test results” that are daily reported in the corrupt MSM then it would be over because basically nothing really happened.
  • Do the so called anti-corona measures such as the lockdowns, face masks, social distancing and quarantining serve to protect the world’s population from corona or do they serve other agendas? Item one on the agenda it to create FEAR.
  • The anti-corona measures whose only basis is the incorrect PCR test have harmed innumerable human lives and have destroyed the economic existence of countless companies and individuals world wide.
  • The PCR Test is being used used on the basis of false statements by highly placed health authorities, not based on scientific facts with respect to infection.
  • A positive PCR Test does not mean any infection in present in the person tested. About 90% of positive tests are FALSE POSITIVES with no SARS-CoV-2 infection present in the tested person.
  • The test information coming with the PCR test kits state they are not to be used for diagnostic purposes. The CDC states the same thing, as does the inventor of the PCR method Doctor Mullis.
  • The mortality of corona is equivalent to that of the seasonal flu,
  • COVID-19 has not caused any excess morality anywhere in the world.
  • The German Government was massively lobbied by by the world’s Big Health Care establishment?
  • The German Government’s Interior Dept has published a report stating the population was deliberately driven to panic by politicians and the media. The honest person responsible for this important report was FIRED by the German government. This show the corruption and crimes includes the German government. This firing of honest people for speaking truth about CON-19 is occurring in large entities all over the world.
  • Our, we the people, only out of this CON-19 is to LOSE our FEAR of CON-19 and call out all the clowns promoting this FEAR. The best way to begin to do this is to learn a little about the fraudulent “PCR test”. All else will follow,

The PCR Test is the Cornerstone of the Fake COVID Pandemic. It’s a technique that can easily be altered at will to fabricate the number of cases, creating trends in the upwards or downwards direction and at the behest of the controllers of the scam. As someone with more than an adequate knowledge of the […]

The post Significant Pitfalls with PCR for the Alleged SARS-CoV-2 Detection and COVID Diagnosis appeared first on The Freedom Articles.

 

This is a summary of the article as I understand it:

— No distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19

— Admitted lack of gold standard test for COVID-19

— PCR test used inappropriate for viral testing (its purpose was manufacturing not testing). Clear example: Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.

— No clear evidence of origin of RNA used in test

— Authors of scientific papers claiming isolation of virus admit that purification of virus not actually done and seasoned virologist admits lack of awareness of any paper showing purification of virus

— No evidence of what is said to be the virus, SARS-CoV-2 causing COVID-19

— Test results are irrational which would only be expected when the testing method used is against scientific testing protocol

— The test contains “q” in its name, RT-qPCR, which should stand for quantitative, however, it is admitted the test is qualitative meaning it cannot test viral load which means they cannot test how many viral particles are carried in the body. For people to be considered infected a viral load needs to be determined.

— High Cycle Quantification (Cq) values undermine validity of test and some PCR tests have high Cq values (Drosten test has 45). The inventor of the test, Kary Mullis, has this to say: “If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.”

— Before starting with PCR, in the case of presumed RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, the RNA must be converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) with the enzyme Reverse Transcriptase—hence the “RT” at the beginning of “PCR” or “qPCR,” but this transformation process is “widely recognized as inefficient and variable,”

The above issues clearly show that there is no evidence at all to believe in either the virus, SARS-CoV-2 or the alleged illness COVID-19. The clear inference to be made is that all illness and death ascribed to COVID-19 has, in reality, another cause.

 

COVID: The Virus That Isn’t There: The Root Fraud Exposed

This is a follow-up to yesterday’s article, in which I exposed the fact that the CDC does not have the COVID coronavirus in its possession, because it is “unavailable.” Their word, not mine.

The CDC is admitting the virus hasn’t been isolated.

In other words, its existence is unproven.

You need to realize the CDC, during its own published confession (see below), is discussing this explosive situation in the context of instructing the world how to perform the PCR test.

The test to detect a virus that isn’t there.

This would be on the order of NASA issuing a guide for navigating a fleet of ships to a planet whose existence has not been established—and the population of the whole world is going to board those ships for the voyage.

The CDC is saying: here is how you detect the virus in a human, here is the test on which we’re going to rely, here is the test on the basis of which we’re going to identify all case numbers and demand all lockdowns—except we don’t have the virus.

Why don’t they have it?

Because they can’t isolate it. That’s obvious.

If they could isolate it, they would.

Let’s not tap dance around this central fact. Let’s not make excuses for the CDC. They have a problem the size of Jupiter. It’s their problem, not ours. But they’re foisting their problem on us, in the form of a STORY ABOUT A PANDEMIC. AND ALL THE LOCKDOWNS THAT FLOW FROM THE STORY.

To say this is unacceptable is a vast understatement. The CDC is committing a crime that has no bounds.


For months, I’ve been writing about the “missing virus” and the studies that should be done to prove it exists—real-world studies that have never been done and will never be done. Now, here is the smoking gun.

I’m aware that many scientists and doctors, who are otherwise exposing the pandemic as a fraud on legitimate grounds, don’t want to touch what I’m revealing here. I would remind them that, months ago, when some of us were already exposing the PCR test as unreliable and useless and deceptive, THAT ISSUE was too hot to touch. But now it isn’t.

The issue of the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus may seem as if it’s too hot, but it isn’t. It’s time to launch a full-on attack. Immediately.

The truth is only bitter for those who are hiding it.

I’m also aware there are people who have been building scenarios about how the virus is “activated.” Certain frequencies wake it up, and so on. Well, the question is: WHAT VIRUS? THE ONE THAT ISN’T THERE?


Still other people would say, “Then what are all these scientists sequencing in their labs, if it’s not the virus?” Again, not our problem. They might start with a piece of RNA, and then claim, without proof, it’s part of SARS-CoV-2; and they go to work on it. They claim anything they want to. It’s not science.

If a mechanic says he has a piece of a fender from a car that has never been seen before; if he claims he knows the car exists; but he can’t show you the car; are you going to buy his story? Are you going to invest your life-savings and life-savings of your family and friends in this car he admits is “unavailable?” Are you going to invest and go broke and sit in your home and wear a mask and keep your distance from other people and close your business and declare bankruptcy? Are you going to consent to that?

Another question that arises: if the virus is missing and has never been isolated, has never been proved to exist, what are they putting in the COVID vaccine? That’s a question that should be answered by law-enforcement agencies raiding many facilities and seizing materials and finding honest scientists who will discover what is really in the COVID vaccine brews. Waiting for that to happen…the sun could go dark first. In the meantime, do you want to take the shot in the arm?


Some people have claimed there are “animal models” which prove the coronavirus exists and is harmful, because the animals become sick, when they are “injected with the virus.” This is incorrect on two counts.

First, the animal models are supposed to progress through various species, until they arrive at animals that most closely resemble humans; chimps. The animal models being cited are mice or hamsters, which are very, very low on the totem pole.

Second, what are these mice being injected with? It’s supposed to be pure virus. But instead, it’s a soup which contains all sorts of material, including chemicals. The chemicals could be causing the animals to become ill.

Here is my breaking story about the virus that isn’t there, from yesterday:

The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available.

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.

This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.

“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.

“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.

“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.

Science is not assumptions.

“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”

They say they did. But in July, the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…

Science is not assumptions.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the 

COVID: The Virus That Isn’t There: The Root Fraud Expose
 

https://thefreedomarticles.com/significant-pitfalls-with-pcr-for-alleged-sars-cov-2-detection/

Significant Pitfalls with PCR for the Alleged SARS-CoV-2 Detection and COVID Diagnosis

The PCR Test is the Cornerstone of the Fake COVID Pandemic. It’s a technique that can easily be altered at will to fabricate the number of cases, creating trends in the upwards or downwards direction and at the behest of the controllers of the scam. As someone with more than an adequate knowledge of the […] The post Significant Pitfalls with PCR for the Alleged SARS-CoV-2 Detection and COVID Diagnosis appeared first on The Freedom Articles.

AT A GLANCE...THE STORY:
This article is anonymously written someone with a sound background in medical sciences and experience in laboratory-based molecular biology research.

THE IMPLICATIONS:
There are so many ways that the PCR laboratory research technique as well as other techniques could be abused to manipulate the incidence and prevalence of a multitude of fake pandemics to suit the political and financial objectives of the orchestrators of chaos, harm, damage and world destruction.Cornerstone of the Fake COVID Pandemic.

It’s a technique that can easily be altered at will to fabricate the number of cases, creating trends in the upwards or downwards direction and at the behest of the controllers of the scam. As someone with more than an adequate knowledge of the medical and clinical sciences along with some postgraduate research experience in the mapping of genomes using molecular genetics techniques, I would like to contribute to our understanding of this nucleic acid amplification method and how information derived from it could be very misleading when it is being used to diagnose purported “infections” in almost anything and everything nowadays.

Is it not amusing to find human swabs, samples of Coca Cola and some fruits all testing positive for “SARS-CoV-2” using the RT-PCR protocol whilst the kit instructions, the enclosed information leaflet, as well as the print on the box, clearly inform the users that the test kit detects SARS-CoV-1 only?

I suspect that the “PCR test” was intentionally chosen for its potential non-specificity. It can be a very useful technique for those wishing to control, mislead, impoverish and eliminate us as it is so easy to manipulate its protocol to suit different purposes.It is an ideal tool to perpetrate massive deceptions.

Specific results could be generated based on specific requirements to meet certain political objectives in order to create the illusion of high and low rates of an imaginary, specific infection in different populations and appearing at different times. Rolling trends of supposed COVID infections, rolling trends of the stampeding of our rights and freedoms all in perfect harmony with the rolling trends of different vaccines presented as the only partial way out of our troubles whilst also being told that our lives might never get back to normal.
And to ensure that systematic analysis of results did not raise much suspicion with regards to bias; some degree of “natural data variability” could be fabricated through the incorporation of a certain percentage of negative test results.

The PCR Can Not Diagnose Anything Useful At All

In my opinion, being positive for the test is like testing humans for epithelial cells (which we all possess) and then confirming that indeed all humans have such cells but pretend that those cells are from a non-human or pathogenic microbial entity. Allow me to make another analogy. How could the finding of some very small, common, ordinary, random screws (that you might find on a trail whilst hiking) necessarily and categorically prove that the screws belonged to a particular car model, manufactured on a specific date and by a specific manufacturer or that those screws belonged to something entirely different, perhaps part of a gadget?
Our bodies are awash with DNA and various RNA molecules which are constantly floating within and outside of our cells.
The laboratory amplification of an alleged, specific and very short segment of DNA/RNA could not prove the existence of microbes nor could it ever predict illness or contribute to death.The Specifics of PCR: A Technique that Can Lend Itself to Manipulation, Fabrication of a Delusion and the Creation of Fear and Anxiety
I would like to refer you to the past statements and interviews of the late and very praiseworthy Dr. Kary Mullis, the Noble Laureate and the inventor of PCR, regarding the limitations of this technique.

1. Size of amplicon (amplified product):
The smaller its size, the higher the probability that the product could be found on a variety of DNA sequences from a variety of organisms, including humans. That is why PCR should not be used for clinical diagnosis.

The size of the amplified DNA segments, supposedly only coding for various proteins of the SARS-CoV-2, is very small: about 112 bp long or slightly longer.

2. Length of individual DNA primers (forward and reverse primers, always a pair), their sequences, their respective concentrations and volumes could be altered thus influencing the specificity of the annealing and the amplification rate of the target DNA/RNA molecules.

3. Types of enzymes (Reverse Transcriptases and Polymerases), their concentrations, their volumes and their chemical modifications prior to use could affect the production rate, the specificity of the amplification and the fidelity (accuracy) of amplification.

4. The denaturation temperature and the duration of denaturation could easily be altered on the PCR thermal cycling machine. Extent of DNA denaturation then determines if primers bind specifically to the “target DNA” or non-specifically to themselves in the next phase. These factors also affect the activity of polymerase enzyme, its half life and the yield.

5. The annealing temperature and the duration of annealing could easily be altered on the PCR thermal cycling machine thus affecting whether the primer pair binds to its “DNA target” specifically or non-specifically to other pieces of DNA or even binds to themselves.

These factors also affect the activity of polymerase enzymes as well as the yield of specific and nonspecific DNA targets.

6. The amplification temperature and the duration of amplification could easily be altered on the PCR thermal cycling machine thus affecting whether the primers remain bonded to the DNA target and the activity, half life and the fidelity of polymerase enzyme as well as the specific and nonspecific yield of DNA from various sources.

7. The number of cycles of PCR / RT-PCR amplification (Cycle Threshold or ct) programmed into the thermal cycling machine might be altered to directly affect how much amplified product is made and whether the sample would be easily detectable (by measuring the emitted fluorescence light) or not.
This could increase or decrease the number of false positives according to prescribed narratives in case of unethical behaviour or genuine laboratory errors. The higher the number of cycles, the larger the degree of amplification of specific and non-specific nucleic acid targets.

8. The concentration and final volume of the pool of RNA/DNA solution affects the degree of amplification. Has RNA been extracted and purified from the pool of DNA, RNA, proteins, cells, carbohydrates, cholesterol and lipids? Or is the RNA in a crude state that could negatively impact its amplification?

9. The concentrations and volumes of solutions of fluorescently labelled deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) could also affect the amplification magnitude. A huge amount of DNA/RNA in the reaction from the start could ensure a higher yield of false positives. There are four dNTPs: dGTP, dCTP, dATP, dTTP.

10. The ratio of the concentration of fluorescently labelled dNTPs over the concentration of unlabelled dNTPs could also affect the amount of DNA signal perceived and thus the number of false positives that could be detected.

11. Contaminants could result in the generation of false positive results.

12. Various enzyme inhibitors could result in the generation of false negative results.

13. Various enzyme promoters could result in the generation of false positive results.

14. The supposed RNA target belonging to the “alleged virus” is not and has never been isolated and purified prior to its amplification in the PCR machine. A swab sample will contain a mixture of DNA and RNA as well as huge amounts of proteins belonging to human cells, various bacteria, viruses, protozoa and fungal species. Even if RNA molecules are isolated and purified from the mixture it would contain total RNA and not just the RNA of the alleged virus. The mixture might still be contaminated with traces of various DNA molecules from a variety of sources.

15. The ionic concentrations and volumes of individual components of the buffer and the final pH of the buffer solution used in the reaction could be altered.16. The handling and preparation of ingredients prior to placement on the thermal cycling machine could also affect the number of false positive rates.17. The water used in the reaction must be double distilled (deionised) and autoclaved prior to use. Contamination with microbes, DNA, RNA, enzymes and other minerals in the water component or other reaction components could yield erroneous and misleading conclusions.

18. The supposed SARS-CoV-2 primer sequences are complementary to hundreds of bacterial and human DNA molecules. 

If one makes a list of all the different pairs of primers that have ever been used in the PCR technique to detect the alleged SARS-CoV 2 throughout the world and compare their sequences with bacterial and human genome data sequences, using the BLAST website as an example, you would find hundreds of almost perfect sequence matches between what is alleged to be portions of various SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 gene sequences, and human and bacterial DNA sequences.

The various primer pairs used in the detection of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus exhibit at least 90% sequence homology with between 4-93 human DNA segments and 100 bacterial DNA segments (see articles at GreenMedInfo). The forward primer in isolation, the reverse primer in isolation, and both in combination, pick up hundreds of matching human and bacterial DNA sequences.And as far as I know, no one has yet to look at sequence similarities and cross matching between SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 primer sequences (used in PCR and RT-PCR for the detection of the alleged viruses) and fungal and parasitic DNA sequences.

And I would not be surprised at all if these sequences match plant genomic sequences too.If the primer pair sequences match hundreds of human and bacterial DNA targets then, by inference, the targets of amplification are also of human and bacterial origin and not of “viral” origin.

However, since the tested swabs contain much more human DNA/RNA than bacterial, viral, fungal and protozoal genetic material, then it is highly likely that the high rates of false positive PCR test results used for allegedly detecting SARS-CoV-2 are actually just detecting human DNA sequences and nothing else.

Irrespective of whether intentional (cheating) or unintentional errors have been made in the PCR reactions or not, the data suggest that the PCR could be detecting hundreds of bacterial and human DNA sequences seemingly portrayed as SARS-CoV-1 or 2 sequences, thus causing huge surges in false positive rates and therefore an unmeasurably harmful levels of anxiety and fear in the world population.

19. Amplification of target DNA molecules does not require a perfect match between the DNA sequence and the primer sequences: with only a 50% homology (base sequence matching) between the unknown DNA sequence and the primer sequences, it would still be possible to amplify DNA from humans, bacteria, fungi and protozoa and then generate false positive test results depending on the setting of PCR conditions and the sequence and length of the primer pairs. The amplified product of the PCR could easily be human DNA masked as viral RNA! Those who believe in absolute control are forcing us to not only wear face masks but seem to be also masking and covering up the real targets of the PCR amplification reaction which appears to be human DNA, bacterial DNA and DNA/RNA from the natural environment.

20. Recent sequencing of the amplified nucleic acid (from PCR) obtained from more than one thousand patients falsely labelled as having SARS-CoV-2 and misdiagnosed as having COVID has shown the presence of influenza A and influenza B sequences in the samples.
It was found that the buffer solution, as just one of the several ingredients used in the RT-PCR protocol, and had allegedly been tainted with influenza virus sequences in more than a thousand samples analysed.At first glance, the first reaction to this finding is that laboratory protocols must be tightened to prevent contamination of the sterile chemical components of the PCR.

The second obvious conclusion from sequence analysis of samples of patients mislabeled as carrying the SARS-CoV-2 would be that anyone carrying influenza A or B viruses might also test false positives for SARS-CoV-

2. The third conclusion might be that the PCR is not a perfect diagnostic method because it amplifies influenza A, influenza B, SARS-CoV-1 as well as SARS-CoV-2 sequences, but that it might still be a reliable tool because it is still capable of specifically amplifying viral sequences and nothing else using the published primer sequences.

We might thus be sold the illusion that, with some minor adjustments to the PCR protocol, we might be able to eventually differentiate between different viruses.

But that is a total fallacy in my opinion. What we are not being told categorically is that all those people who apparently test positive with the PCR for COVID, whether they appear healthy or unhealthy, are not carrying any kind of microbes whatsoever. The PCR is capable of amplifying, under the right conditions, any non-specific piece of DNA and RNA from humans, from bacteria and maybe even from many other microorganisms.

With inclusion of exogenous RNA/DNA as targets into the PCR mixture, irrespective of its source, the amount of non-specific DNA amplification (signal) would increase, pushing the agenda of labelling more of the tested patients as being positive for an imaginary virus.

What if there might be subtle efforts to try to show that if SARS-CoV-2 could not be detected at least “another virus” could be seen as contributing towards both false positive laboratory results in order to suggest that patients might be infected with a mixture of viruses but due to technical difficulties only the influenza virus sequences could be identified whilst SARS-CoV-2 could not be detected?Since the PCR might be amplifying any piece of RNA and DNA, both from humans and bacteria, how sensible would it be to suggest that some randomly floating and amplified RNA emanated only from a virus, irrespective of the specific species or strains of the alleged microbe?

It is highly unlikely that all false positive cases in the world would have been the result of contamination of the tested sample with RNA from influenza A and B viruses.Even in the absence of contamination, the same PCR protocol has the potential to amplify just about any piece of nucleic acid from a variety of species. Are we seeing a tactic to merely control, mitigate, repair and perhaps salvage the damaged reputation of the PCR as the alleged gold standard for the detection of a multitude of present and future well-orchestrated, well-timed, conveniently handpicked, suddenly flourishing and imaginary nasty microbes as well as the method by which imaginary diseases could be fabricated out of thin air with the sleight of hand?

21. New evidence is shedding more light on virology research and questioning the dogmatic beliefs in this field in general.

None of the “7 coronaviruses” have ever been isolated and purified. What if other published viral sequences are also just computer models?

22. There is some evidence from the CDC website that SARS-CoV-2 sequences seem to have been generated using computer models. It is alleged that SARS-CoV-2 virus has a total of 30,000 organic bases as an RNA molecule even though it has never been extracted and purified from a single COVID case patient. 

The CDC seems to suggest that SARS-CoV-2 was a computer-generated digital virus with 37 bases allegedly sourced from cases (0.001%) with 29, 963 bases (99.99 %) having been fabricated using genomic databases.Might this behaviour not constitute fraud?


23. Many of us are rather sceptical about the germ theory of diseases in general and unfortunately, there seems to be a conglomerate of powerful and malevolent forces that are constantly and mercilessly pushing the virus agenda. And irrespective of the designated name of a particular trendy virus, this same force subsequently follows up the proceedings with relentless and persistent propaganda to forcefully peddle new vaccines onto the unsuspecting public under the pretext of protecting public health through the fabrication of an endless supply of new and supposedly ever-evolving list of imaginary and dangerous microbes.Please look up the ignored historical arguments between Dr. Bechamp and Dr. Pasteur that took place about hundred years ago.

24. But where have we repeatedly seen computer modelling before? In the prediction of various endemic and pandemic infectious diseases for the last fifty years at least. All those predictions were hugely exaggerated to drive the narrative of the germ theory of disease. By creating the perception of harmful, illusory infectious agents, the pharmaceutical companies, the medical industrial complex, governments and eugenicists push the need for swift action through virtue signalling by ordering edicts allegedly meant to “protect the public” and coercing populations into giving up their freedoms and submitting to inhumane and very harmful treatments. Those policies are there just to enrich the parasitic minority at the expense of the huge majority.

25. Surely, the notification of a positive PCR result is the harbinger of bad news for the mental and physical health of most of humanity and yet proves itself as a valuable tool in the machinations of those tiny minorities intent on causing undue harm to mankind.What if the PCR technique is being used as a tool and as the Holy Grail by the control freaks to establish and perpetuate their nefarious agendas – Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030?Further Questions to PonderCould PCR that is routinely carried out in a minute cup (a well in a microtiter plate) be a significant treasure for control freaks?Could the abuse of the PCR technique and “other dubious diagnostic techniques” bestow technologists miraculous and magical powers that could amplify DNA (alchemy), determine mankind’s fate and simultaneously act as an enabler of technocracy and tyranny?Could the abuse of PCR create massive deceptions by creating false positive results and mislabel people as sick and dangerous to others and thus promulgate the necessity for mass vaccination programs as the only way to control the imaginary virus?

Could the abuse of PCR create unprecedented opportunities for the medical-industrial-political complex and the banking industries?Could the abuse of this technique make satanic psychopaths happier when they see the enormous suffering, misery, illness and death of the majority caused by their policies – the inevitable consequences of false positive PCR results?

Could the abuse of such techniques not make the egocentric and solipsistic minority more delighted when they see the exponential increase in their own power, wealth and control?

Might the abuse of these techniques by the superbly rich people help with their delusion of trying to achieve immortality and reverse senescence through the  inevitable increase in the number of abortions and the extent of human trafficking and organ harvesting procedures?Could the abuse of this technique or “other trendy diagnostic techniques” in the near future provide the psychopaths with spiritual sustenance in infinite abundance (through the use of torture, abuse, abductions, societal destruction and demicide as satanic rituals) and material sustenance in infinite abundance (through the synchronous control, rationing and contamination of the world’s food production and distribution networks) whilst people are constantly being distracted by COVID, new vaccines, loss of their freedom, poverty, fake elections and rallies of controlled opposition groups?Could all these questions be answered by examining the agendas of the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation among many others?

The aim of the psychopathic few would be to foment a significant decrease in the world population with a small minority of sheeple remaining – dumbed down obedient slaves exhibiting minimal cognitive abilities, incapable of rationality and critical analysis – with all the natural resources and wealth of the world in the hands of the tyrannical dominion.

Synopsis

You could easily have a situation where you have the same patient/case, same nurse, same technician, same sample, same time and date, same equipment but different results which is total and utter nonsense.

There seems to be intentional errors in and manipulations of the conditions of the RT-PCR in order to fabricate the fraud of much higher rates of non-specific, misleading and random amplifications of human and bacterial DNA target sequences. The more people get tested, the more people yield positive results for the illusive SARS-CoV-2 thus increasing the number of people alleged to be suffering from an imaginary COVID disease. These nefarious policies of fabrication of false and biased data have been in temporal resonance with certain official political objectives and announcements of the officialdom at designated times.Such policies work hand in glove and in perfect harmony with the spewing of fear propaganda created to drive us into a programmed and preconceived path of the Pied Piper.

The PCR method is used to chemically amplify a very short piece of non-specific DNA in order to generate false positive data; inducing and amplifying frequent and regular psychological traumas, chaos, untold damage to people’s lives and madness. Its esoteric value could be to induce control, obedience, conformity, uncertainty, confusion, compliance and a lack of belief in logic and common sense.

All these repugnant practices, policies and responses are killing and psychologically torturing innocent human beings.If you are determined to socially engineer populations by creating a storm in a teacup, you might want to manipulate the PCR and other diagnostic techniques to fabricate cases.Suddenly and by some magic, a very small, unimportant, harmless, irrelevant piece of floating RNA/DNA that has been amplified billions of times becomes visible, relevant, omnipotent, omnipresent and irreverent. A theatrical tool to foment confusion, fear and chaos by making us frightened of an imaginary virus.If you happen to test positive, they label you as having COVID and, if by happenstance your test results are negative, it has been reported that laboratories and clinicians had been ordered to keep repeating the test 30 times or more in order to get a 1 in 30 hit, forcing the false positive result. When through sheer persistence and cheating, the system finally finds you positive, suddenly the total number of cases would go up by a figure of 30 just based on your own “final result” alone. Because the laboratory might have repeated your test 30 times, your case would be counted as thirty cases!Now imagine this nauseating and repulsive scenario whilst testing billions of people around the world!

There are just so many ways for the policy makers to use deceit to bulk up their statistics that it beggars belief. Such tricks constitute a heinous crime and one that disturbs the human conscience and our souls. What has been going on is pseudoscience, fakery and fraud.Instantly, very healthy people testing “positive” are vilified, harassed, intimidated and stigmatised as spreaders of “disease”. Our pockets are emptied and we are impoverished. We would then be manipulated, corralled and coerced into taking their poisonous toxins as vaccines; guaranteed to cut short your longevity and healthspan as well as lifespan. Alternatively, to cool things down and pretend that the sophistry of the planners of the draconian, ineffective plandemic measures (such as social distancing, masking, lockdowns, the endless vaccinations, the use of personal protective equipment, the use of air filters and hand sanitisers, the shutting down of societies, commerce and trade and the ensuing meltdowns) had been effective in temporarily controlling the pre-ordained spread of the illusory virus; at the behest of the controllers, just like flipping a switch, the various parameters on the PCR thermal cycling machine could be altered to magically create the illusion of a “significant decrease” in the number of “positive” cases/deaths.
The supposedly significant decrease in cases and deaths would then be strongly and unequivocally causatively linked to the beneficial and positive role of their supposedly preventive public health measures; notably and mainly through the use of their toxic vaccines.

A frequent, regular and constant propaganda piece presented and flaunted about by the media and governments in order to drive/coerce specific, preconceived narratives and evil agendas using mind crowding and encirclement.

The amplification of very small amounts of short and very common DNA segments that could easily belong to humans, bacteria and other organisms does not prove the existence of a specific microbe whatsoever.ConclusionPolymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) must not be perceived as the gold standard of diagnosis with which to assess and compare the reliability of other screening methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 or any other viruses. Nor could it be assumed to be a screening method.

The virus has never been isolated and purified and there are no gold standards for its detection and quantitative measurement. Without the existence of a gold standard for the isolation, purification, detection and quantitative measurement of the virus itself; the use of terms such as true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative would be misleading.

Therefore, the spouting of misnomers such as specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values in attempting to gauge the reliability and accuracy of detection of SARS-CoV-2 or any other virus using the PCR method would be leading us down a deep, long, tortuous and stenching rabbit hole.Presence of a common DNA/RNA sequence does not prove the existence of a specific gene or a specific organism.Presence of a specific DNA/RNA sequence does not prove the existence and viability of a specific organism.Natural and harmless RNA/DNA must not be perceived as harmful agents.

Presence of microbes does not prove the existence of disease.A positive PCR result does not indicate disease of any kind.Real science should be about facing the truth without flinching. It must be about honesty, integrity, unbiased enquiry and transparency. It is about thinking and reasoning and arguing. It is about abandoning false beliefs and dogmatic faith.We must not allow agents of chaos to destroy humanity and the natural world based on fabrications.

Yes, the natural world. Those same people who espouse saving humanity and the planet and reducing pollution are the greatest destroyers and polluters of the natural world themselves. A case of doublespeak and hypocrisy.

Tags:agenda 2030 COVID Cycle Threshold Kary MullisPCRRT-PCRSARS-CoV-1SARS-CoV-2

PREVIOUS ARTICLE

Do Mandatory Masks and Vaccines Break the 10 Points of the Nuremburg Code?CommentsVehuiah UknoWme? • 18 hours ago

THE PCR DECEPTION⎮Short Documentary About the Test Used for Covid-19

Kari Mullis, the inventor of the test spells it out clearly that the PCR test IS NOT MEANT TO IDENTIFY A VIRUS. It must be isolated and in the CDC's own documentation and the Chinese head of their CDC on NBC news stated that they have not isolated the virus. There is no COVID-19 as it is reverse engineering for the degeneration of humanity into a GMO herd which will be radically culled and those remaining will be part of a transhuman society. All of the rest of life is being wiped out as well as this is a global omnicide with populations of wild species plummeting down by 90% of microbes, 80-90% of flying insects and the chain of reduction follows suit. If one cannot observe the loss over time and the inability to even plant a garden with what used to be near 100% germination and now down to a fraction of that for many and production for fresh fruits and heirloom vegetables, then you are not paying attention.

 A good channel to see the elimination of the earth as we knew it is at geoengineeringwatch.org. Carnicom has isolated bacteria that destroys the microbes and causes seeds to rot rather than germinate and his video footage is comprehensive.If you think this is too far fetched and Morgellons is a fantasy, your bodies are already being wired. Liquid computing and the article from MIT "Viral assembly of oriented quantum dot nanowires communicated by Susan Lindquist, Whitehead Institute of Biomedical Research on April 18, 2003 - has shown success.

There are several other papers especially from DARPA and in the Armed Services that were published in 7/2001 that point exactly to this and are available from the Internet Archive which is getting scrubbed itself.

The evidence is in. When do the legal proceedings begin?

 
Why the next flu season may be worse than ever: There have been barely any cases this winter thanks to Covid restrictions. But now experts fear this will leave us dangerously exposed
 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9314063/Why-flu-season-worse-Experts-fear-year-leave-exposed.html?ito=push-notification&ci=87234&si=26860635
 

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically MeaninglessThough the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose

Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter

* “Germs are a necessary part of a healthy immune system, helping our body’s defenses beef up and fight future illnesses. When a person’s exposure to germs is decreased, problems may arise.

Researchers studied two kinds of mice: One group had been exposed to a normal bacteria environment, and another group that was germ-free. When scientists compared the immune systems of the two groups of mice, they found what they cited as evidence to support the hygiene hypothesis – the mice that had been exposed to microbes had stronger immune systems than the germ-free mice.

Additionally, the germ-free mice had exaggerated inflammation in their lungs and colon, similar to what is seen in humans who have asthma and ulcerative colitis. The researchers found that a particular kind of immune cell, called an invariant natural killer T cell, was particularly hyperactive in these mice.
But looking closely at the facts, the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2.Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify “positive” patients, whereby “positive” is usually equated with “infected.”

UNFOUNDED “TEST, TEST, TEST,…” MANTRA

the media briefing on COVID-19 on March 16, 2020,

the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said:

We have a simple message for all countries: test, test, test.”

The message was spread through headlines around the world, for instance by Reuters and the BBC.

Still on the 3 of May, the moderator of the heute journal — one of the most important news magazines on German television— was passing the mantra of the corona dogma on to his audience with the admonishing words:

Test, test, test—that is the credo at the moment, and it is the only way to really understand how much the coronavirus is spreading.”

This indicates that the belief in the validity of the PCR tests is so strong that it equals a religion that tolerates virtually no contradiction.

But it is well known that religions are about faith and not about scientific facts. And as Walter Lippmann, the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said: “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”

So to start, it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, did not think alike. His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993.

Unfortunately, Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74, but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection.

The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.

How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.

LACK OF A VALID GOLD STANDARD

Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with.

This is a fundamental point. Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity”[1] and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available.

As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?”:

If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”

Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this. In her paper “Interpreting a COVID-19 test result”, published recently in The British Medical Journal, she writes that there is a “lack of such a clear-cut ‘gold-standard’ for COVID-19 testing.”

But instead of classifying the tests as unsuitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnosis, or instead of pointing out that only a virus, proven through isolation and purification, can be a solid gold standard, Watson claims in all seriousness that, “pragmatically” COVID-19 diagnosis itself, remarkably including PCR testing itself, “may be the best available ‘gold standard’.” But this is not scientifically sound.

Apart from the fact that it is downright absurd to take the PCR test itself as part of the gold standard to evaluate the PCR test, there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, as even people such as Thomas Löscher, former head of the Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine at the University of Munich and member of the Federal Association of German Internists, conceded to us[2].

And if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, COVID-19 diagnosis — contrary to Watson’s statement — cannot be suitable for serving as a valid gold standard.

In addition, “experts” such as Watson overlook the fact that only virus isolation, i.e. an unequivocal virus proof, can be the gold standard.

That is why I asked Watson how COVID-19 diagnosis “may be the best available gold standard,” if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, and also whether the virus itself, that is virus isolation, wouldn’t be the best available/possible gold standard. But she hasn’t answered these questions yet – despite multiple requests. And she has not yet responded to our rapid response post on her article in which we address exactly the same points, either, though she wrote us on June 2nd“I will try to post a reply later this week when I have a chance.”

NO PROOF FOR THE RNA BEING OF VIRAL ORIGIN

Now the question is: What is required first for virus isolation/proof? We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from.

As textbooks (e.g., White/Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9) as well as leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer state, particle purification — i.e. the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object, as for instance Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 by extracting it from tons of pitchblende — is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus, and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus.

The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand.

And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed.

Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses.

But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and NB., nobody said purification was not a necessary step. We only got answers like “No, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” (see below).

We asked several study authors “Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus?”, they gave the following responses:

Study 1: Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” Nature Medicine, March 2020
Replying Author: Malik Peiris
Date: May 12, 2020
Answer: “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”

Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19”, Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020
Replying Author: Myung-Guk Han
Date: May 6, 2020
Answer: “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.”

Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea”, Journal of Korean Medical Science, February 24, 2020
Replying Author: Wan Beom Park
Date: March 19, 2020
Answer: “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”

Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China”, 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020
Replying Author: Wenjie Tan
Date: March 18, 2020
Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”

Regarding the mentioned papers it is clear that what is shown in the electron micrographs (EMs) is the end result of the experiment, meaning there is no other result that they could have made EMs from.

That is to say, if the authors of these studies concede that their published EMs do not show purified particles, then they definitely do not possess purified particles claimed to be viral. (In this context, it has to be remarked that some researchers use the term “isolation” in their papers, but the procedures described therein do not represent a proper isolation (purification) process. Consequently, in this context the term “isolation” is misused).

Thus, the authors of four of the principal, early 2020 papers claiming discovery of a new coronavirus concede they had no proof that the origin of the virus genome was viral-like particles or cellular debris, pure or impure, or particles of any kind. In other words, the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.

We have also contacted Dr Charles Calisher, who is a seasoned virologist. In 2001, Science published an “impassioned plea…to the younger generation” from several veteran virologists, among them Calisher, saying that:

[modern virus detection methods like] sleek polymerase chain reaction […] tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, [or] how it makes people sick. [It is] like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint.”[3]

And that’s why we asked Dr Calisher whether he knows one single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally really purified. His answer:

I know of no such a publication. I have kept an eye out for one.”[4]

This actually means that one cannot conclude that the RNA gene sequences, which the scientists took from the tissue samples prepared in the mentioned in vitro trials and for which the PCR tests are finally being “calibrated,” belong to a specific virus — in this case SARS-CoV-2.

In addition, there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.

In order to establish a causal connection, one way or the other, i.e. beyond virus isolation and purification, it would have been absolutely necessary to carry out an experiment that satisfies the four Koch’s postulates. But there is no such experiment, as Amory Devereux and Rosemary Frei recently revealed for OffGuardian.

The necessity to fulfill these postulates regarding SARS-CoV-2 is demonstrated not least by the fact that attempts have been made to fulfill them. But even researchers claiming they have done it, in reality, did not succeed.

One example is a study published in Nature on May 7. This trial, besides other procedures which render the study invalid, did not meet any of the postulates.

For instance, the alleged “infected” laboratory mice did not show any relevant clinical symptoms clearly attributable to pneumonia, which according to the third postulate should actually occur if a dangerous and potentially deadly virus was really at work there. And the slight bristles and weight loss, which were observed temporarily in the animals are negligible, not only because they could have been caused by the procedure itself, but also because the weight went back to normal again.

Also, no animal died except those they killed to perform the autopsies. And let’s not forget: These experiments should have been done before developing a test, which is not the case.

Revealingly, none of the leading German representatives of the official theory about SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 — the Robert Koch-Institute (RKI), Alexander S. Kekulé (University of Halle), Hartmut Hengel and Ralf Bartenschlager (German Society for Virology), the aforementioned Thomas Löscher, Ulrich Dirnagl (Charité Berlin) or Georg Bornkamm (virologist and professor emeritus at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Munich) — could answer the following question I have sent them:

If the particles that are claimed to be to be SARS-CoV-2 have not been purified, how do you want to be sure that the RNA gene sequences of these particles belong to a specific new virus?

Particularly, if there are studies showing that substances such as antibiotics that are added to the test tubes in the in vitro experiments carried out for virus detection can “stress” the cell culture in a way that new gene sequences are being formed that were not previously detectable — an aspect that Nobel laureate Barbara McClintock already drew attention to in her Nobel Lecture back in 1983.

It should not go unmentioned that we finally got the Charité – the employer of Christian Drosten, Germany’s most influential virologist in respect of COVID-19, advisor to the German government and co-developer of the PCR test which was the first to be “accepted” (not validated!) by the WHO worldwide – to answer questions on the topic.

But we didn’t get answers until June 18, 2020, after months of non-response. In the end, we achieved it only with the help of Berlin lawyer Viviane Fischer.

Regarding our question “Has the Charité convinced itself that appropriate particle purification was carried out?,” the Charité concedes that they didn’t use purified particles.

And although they claim “virologists at the Charité are sure that they are testing for the virus,” in their paper (Corman et al.) they state:

RNA was extracted from clinical samples with the MagNA Pure 96 system (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) and from cell culture supernatants with the viral RNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany),”

Which means they just assumed the RNA was viral.

Incidentally, the Corman et al. paper, published on January 23, 2020 didn’t even go through a proper peer review process, nor were the procedures outlined therein accompanied by controls — although it is only through these two things that scientific work becomes really solid.

IRRATIONAL TEST RESULTS

It is also certain that we cannot know the false positive rate of the PCR tests without widespread testing of people who certainly do not have the virus, proven by a method which is independent of the test (having a solid gold standard).

Therefore, it is hardly surprising that there are several papers illustrating irrational test results.

For example, already in February the health authority in China’s Guangdong province reported that people have fully recovered from illness blamed on COVID-19, started to test “negative,” and then tested “positive” again.

A month later, a paper published in the Journal of Medical Virology showed that 29 out of 610 patients at a hospital in Wuhan had 3 to 6 test results that flipped between “negative”, “positive” and “dubious”.

A third example is a study from Singapore in which tests were carried out almost daily on 18 patients and the majority went from “positive” to “negative” back to “positive” at least once, and up to five times in one patient.

Even Wang Chen, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, conceded in February that the PCR tests are “only 30 to 50 per cent accurate”; while Sin Hang Lee from the Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory sent a letter to the WHO’s coronavirus response team and to Anthony S. Fauci on March 22, 2020, saying that:

It has been widely reported in the social media that the RT-qPCR [Reverse Transcriptase quantitative PCR] test kits used to detect SARSCoV-2 RNA in human specimens are generating many false positive results and are not sensitive enough to detect some real positive cases.”

In other words, even if we theoretically assume that these PCR tests can really detect a viral infection, the tests would be practically worthless, and would only cause an unfounded scare among the “positive” people tested.

This becomes also evident considering the positive predictive value (PPV).

The PPV indicates the probability that a person with a positive test result is truly “positive” (ie. has the supposed virus), and it depends on two factors: the prevalence of the virus in the general population and the specificity of the test, that is the percentage of people without disease in whom the test is correctly “negative” (a test with a specificity of 95% incorrectly gives a positive result in 5 out of 100 non-infected people).

With the same specificity, the higher the prevalence, the higher the PPV.

In this context, on June 12 2020, the journal Deutsches Ärzteblatt published an article in which the PPV has been calculated with three different prevalence scenarios.

The results must, of course, be viewed very critically, first because it is not possible to calculate the specificity without a solid gold standard, as outlined, and second because the calculations in the article are based on the specificity determined in the study by Jessica Watson, which is potentially worthless, as also mentioned.

But if you abstract from it, assuming that the underlying specificity of 95% is correct and that we know the prevalence, even the mainstream medical journal Deutsches Ärzteblatt reports that the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests may have “a shockingly low” PPV.

In one of the three scenarios, figuring with an assumed prevalence of 3%, the PPV was only 30 percent, which means that 70 percent of the people tested “positive” are not “positive” at all. Yet “they are prescribed quarantine,” as even the Ärzteblatt notes critically.

In a second scenario of the journal’s article, a prevalence of rate of 20 percent is assumed. In this case they generate a PPV of 78 percent, meaning that 22 percent of the “positive” tests are false “positives.”

That would mean: If we take the around 9 million people who are currently considered “positive” worldwide — supposing that the true “positives” really have a viral infection — we would get almost 2 million false “positives.”

All this fits with the fact that the CDC and the FDA, for instance, concede in their files that the so-called “SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests” are not suitable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis.

In the “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel“ file from March 30, 2020, for example, it says:

Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms”

And:

This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”

And the FDA admits that:

positive results […] do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”

Remarkably, in the instruction manuals of PCR tests we can also read that they are not intended as a diagnostic test, as for instance in those by Altona Diagnostics and Creative Diagnostics[5].

To quote another one, in the product announcement of the LightMix Modular Assays produced by TIB Molbiol — which were developed using the Corman et al. protocol — and distributed by Roche we can read:

These assays are not intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of coronavirus infection”

And:

For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.”

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT THE TESTS CAN MEASURE THE “VIRAL LOAD”?

There is also reason to conclude that the PCR test from Roche and others cannot even detect the targeted genes.

Moreover, in the product descriptions of the RT-qPCR tests for SARS-COV-2 it says they are “qualitative” tests, contrary to the fact that the “q” in “qPCR” stands for “quantitative.” And if these tests are not “quantitative” tests, they don’t show how many viral particles are in the body.

That is crucial because, in order to even begin talking about actual illness in the real world not only in a laboratory, the patient would need to have millions and millions of viral particles actively replicating in their body.

That is to say, the CDC, the WHO, the FDA or the RKI may assert that the tests can measure the so-called “viral load,” i.e. how many viral particles are in the body. “But this has never been proven. That is an enormous scandal,” as the journalist Jon Rappoport points out.

This is not only because the term “viral load” is deception. If you put the question “what is viral load?” at a dinner party, people take it to mean viruses circulating in the bloodstream. They’re surprised to learn it’s actually RNA molecules.

Also, to prove beyond any doubt that the PCR can measure how much a person is “burdened” with a disease-causing virus, the following experiment would have had to be carried out (which has not yet happened):

You take, let’s say, a few hundred or even thousand people and remove tissue samples from them. Make sure the people who take the samples do not perform the test.The testers will never know who the patients are and what condition they’re in. The testers run their PCR on the tissue samples. In each case, they say which virus they found and how much of it they found. Then, for example, in patients 29, 86, 199, 272, and 293 they found a great deal of what they claim is a virus. Now we un-blind those patients. They should all be sick, because they have so much virus replicating in their bodies. But are they really sick — or are they fit as a fiddle?

With the help of the aforementioned lawyer Viviane Fischer, I finally got the Charité to also answer the question of whether the test developed by Corman et al. — the so-called “Drosten PCR test” — is a quantitative test.

But the Charité was not willing to answer this question “yes”. Instead, the Charité wrote:

If real-time RT-PCR is involved, to the knowledge of the Charité in most cases these are […] limited to qualitative detection.”

Furthermore, the “Drosten PCR test” uses the unspecific E-gene assay as preliminary assay, while the Institut Pasteur uses the same assay as confirmatory assay.

According to Corman et al., the E-gene assay is likely to detect all Asian viruses, while the other assays in both tests are supposed to be more specific for sequences labelled “SARS-CoV-2”.

Besides the questionable purpose of having either a preliminary or a confirmatory test that is likely to detect all Asian viruses, at the beginning of April the WHO changed the algorithm, recommending that from then on a test can be regarded as “positive” even if just the E-gene assay (which is likely to detect all Asian viruses!gives a “positive” result.

This means that a confirmed unspecific test result is officially sold as specific.

That change of algorithm increased the “case” numbers. Tests using the E-gene assay are produced for example by Roche, TIB Molbiol and R-Biopharm.

HIGH CQ VALUES MAKE THE TEST RESULTS EVEN MORE MEANINGLESS

Another essential problem is that many PCR tests have a “cycle quantification” (Cq) value of over 35, and some, including the “Drosten PCR test”, even have a Cq of 45.

The Cq value specifies how many cycles of DNA replication are required to detect a real signal from biological samples.

“Cq values higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported,” as it says in the MIQE guidelines.

MIQE stands for “Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments”, a set of guidelines that describe the minimum information necessary for evaluating publications on Real-Time PCR, also called quantitative PCR, or qPCR.

The inventor himself, Kary Mullis, agreed, when he stated:

If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.”

The MIQE guidelines have been developed under the aegis of Stephen A. Bustin, Professor of Molecular Medicine, a world-renowned expert on quantitative PCR and author of the book A-Z of Quantitative PCR which has been called “the bible of qPCR.”

In a recent podcast interview Bustin points out that “the use of such arbitrary Cq cut-offs is not ideal, because they may be either too low (eliminating valid results) or too high (increasing false “positive” results).”

And, according to him, a Cq in the 20s to 30s should be aimed at and there is concern regarding the reliability of the results for any Cq over 35.

If the Cq value gets too high, it becomes difficult to distinguish real signal from background, for example due to reactions of primers and fluorescent probes, and hence there is a higher probability of false positives.

Moreover, among other factors that can alter the result, before starting with the actual PCR, in case you are looking for presumed RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, the RNA must be converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) with the enzyme Reverse Transcriptase—hence the “RT” at the beginning of “PCR” or “qPCR.”

But this transformation process is “widely recognized as inefficient and variable,” as Jessica Schwaber from the Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine in Toronto and two research colleagues pointed out in a 2019 paper.

Stephen A. Bustin acknowledges problems with PCR in a comparable way.

For example, he pointed to the problem that in the course of the conversion process (RNA to cDNA) the amount of DNA obtained with the same RNA base material can vary widely, even by a factor of 10 (see above interview).

Considering that the DNA sequences get doubled at every cycle, even a slight variation becomes magnified and can thus alter the result, annihilating the test’s reliable informative value.

So how can it be that those who claim the PCR tests are highly meaningful for so-called COVID-19 diagnosis blind out the fundamental inadequacies of these tests—even if they are confronted with questions regarding their validity?

Certainly, the apologists of the novel coronavirus hypothesis should have dealt with these questions before throwing the tests on the market and putting basically the whole world under lockdown, not least because these are questions that come to mind immediately for anyone with even a spark of scientific understanding.

Thus, the thought inevitably emerges that financial and political interests play a decisive role for this ignorance about scientific obligations. NB, the WHO, for example has financial ties with drug companies, as the British Medical Journal showed in 2010.

And experts criticize “that the notorious corruption and conflicts of interest at WHO have continued, even grown“ since then. The CDC as well, to take another big player, is obviously no better off.

Finally, the reasons and possible motives remain speculative, and many involved surely act in good faith; but the science is clear: The numbers generated by these RT-PCR tests do not in the least justify frightening people who have been tested “positive” and imposing lockdown measures that plunge countless people into poverty and despair or even drive them to suicide.

And a “positive” result may have serious consequences for the patients as well, because then all non-viral factors are excluded from the diagnosis and the patients are treated with highly toxic drugs and invasive intubations. Especially for elderly people and patients with pre-existing conditions such a treatment can be fatal, as we have outlined in the article “Fatal Therapie.”

Without doubt eventual excess mortality rates are caused by the therapy and by the lockdown measures, while the “COVID-19” death statistics comprise also patients who died of a variety of diseases, redefined as COVID-19 only because of a “positive” test result whose value could not be more doubtful.

NOTES:-

[1] Sensitivity is defined as the proportion of patients with disease in whom the test is positive; and specificity is defined as the proportion of patients without disease in whom the test is negative.

[2] E-mail from Prof. Thomas Löscher from March 6, 2020

[3] Martin Enserink. Virology. Old guard urges virologists to go back to basics, Science, July 6, 2001, p. 24

[4] E-mail from Charles Calisher from May 10, 2020

[5] Creative Diagnostics, SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit

Torsten Engelbrecht is an award-winning journalist and author from Hamburg, Germany. In 2006 he co-authored Virus-Mania with Dr Klaus Kohnlein, and in 2009 he won the German Alternate Media Award. He has also written for Rubikon, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Financial Times Deutschland and many others.
Konstantin Demeter is a freelance photographer and an independent researcher. Together with the journalist Torsten Engelbrecht he has published articles on the “COVID-19” crisis in the online magazine Rubikon, as well as contributions on the monetary system, geopolitics, and the media in Swiss Italian newspapers.
 
FILED UNDER: CORONAVIRUSFEATUREDLATESTSTATISTICS AND ANALYSIS
 
 
Glen Kealey - On the Farm:
THINK the next time you shout ~I AM FREE~! All people are Free. Braindead Slaves cost their controllers absolutely nothing and they do their own shopping. The SculPTor.....
 
Born : January 8, 1942
Educated : by the SYSTEM 1942 to 1987 - First wife, 1 girl & 3 boys
Awakening : 1987 to 1998 - Second wife 1994/98, (divorced 2002)
Self-educated : 1995 to 2002
SculPTor/Teacher : of Ultimate Reality : 2000 to Present
Glen Kealey
Glen Kealey states all the research he has done into the history of earth what the scientists say, and the codes and information through various sources after 40 years of research is that through natural disasters and deliberately engineered disasters by those who have the technology to create earth quakes, rocks falling from the sky in the form of comets, title waves and explosions of large parts of the earth's crust has led him to conclude that sometime between 2008 and 2050 there is strong possibility of a large part of the earth between the 8th parallel south and the 53rd parallel north will be effectively changed and turn into black water/magna rock and/or covered in water etc and this will end up with the area above the 53rd parallel and below the 8th parallel being the main part of the earth left relatively untouched and being the best and safest place to live and survive in the next 1,000 years.
There are many various groups and individuals from all walks of life and from all sorts of view points that all say the same thing:
things are going to change in the near future, from a social, economic and geographic point of view in many different ways, and it seems that what Glen Kealey is saying in his many talks makes a lot of sense and can not be ignored without further investigation.
Many of the various group and individuals all seem to be sure the governments, and the various security groups such as the CIA, MI5, MI6, KBG, Mossad are not in the least interested in telling the general public the truth and will be quite happy for the average person who are not part of the right club or network, and if any major natural and/or man made disaster was about to happen, they would not be told about it before the event, with many false information about a lot of disasters that never happen, so when the real one does happen or is about to happen, the average person will not believe it is really happening and will be caught unaware...with the overall aim achieved by those that seem to be in control who seem to want the worlds population reduced to under one billion people, and only the selected ones in the know or the lucky ones in the right place will survive what ever they have planned... there are a lot of investigators that say that the Human Beings as we are today have been partly geneticlly engineered as economic slaves to mine the earth and develop outer space technology and exploration and that the scientists are secretly developing a new more efficient economic slave that will be one that will be a woman that can impregnate herself without the need for a man to do the job, so that they can be sent to outer space in thousands of space vessels to see if they can find other rocks that can be settled on or mined etc for their minerals and the can breed without the need to a man to impregnate them.
A new group of economic slaves that are women but do not need a man to have a relationship to have a baby and thus this would be a much more efficient ecnomic slave than the current models...
 

References

1 Fisher BL. How Fear of a Virus Changed Our WorldNVIC Newsletter June 1, 2020.

2 Anderson A. These Endless Public Health Mandates Threaten American's Liberty. Heritage Foundation Mar. 15, 2021.

3 Weisberg L, Molnar P. With vaccination rates up and COVID-19 cases way down, California is poised to ditch masks and social distancing, but there are still some rules and protections in place as we navigate a new pandemic landscape. LaJolla Light June 14 2021.

4 Council of the District of Columbia. B23-0171-Minor Consent for Vaccination Amendment Act of 2019. (Effective from Mar. 16, 2021).

5 Al-Arshani S. Kids as young as 11 years old would be able to consent to vaccinations under a new bill proposed in Washington, DCBusiness Insider Oct. 21, 2020.

6 Richardson D. DC Bill B23-0181 Allowing Children 11 Years Old and Older to Be Vaccinated Without Parental Knowledge or Consent AdvancesThe Vaccine Reaction Oct. 26, 2020.

7 Smith W. D.C. to Legalize Vaccination of 11-Year Olds Without Parental OKNational Review Nov. 5, 2020.

8 Turner M. DC Council to make final vote on bill that would allow minors to get vaccines without parental consent. WUSA-9 Nov. 12, 2020.

9 Austermuhle M. D.C. Activists Want Bowset to Veto Bill That Would Allow Minors to Consent to Vaccines. NPR Dec. 7, 2020.

10 Ault A. 11-Year-Olds Could Receive Vaccines Without Parental Consent in DCMedscape Dec. 24, 2020.

11 McNeely M. Bill to Let 11-Year Olds Make Medical Decision: Will Congress Say No? Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) Feb. 24, 2021.

12 Parentalrights.org. Breaking DC Update: Lee Attempts "Common Consent." Mar. 3, 2021.

13 FindLaw. Understanding Informed Consent and Your Rights as a Patient. June 6, 2018.

14 Blakemore SJ, Robbins TW. Decision-making in the adolescent brainNature Neuroscience 2012; 15: 1184-1191.

15 Fisher BL. Do You Know How to Recognize A Vaccine Reaction? NVIC Newsletter Aug. 27, 2018.

16 National Vaccine Information Center. If You Vaccinate, Ask 8 Questions.

17 Austermuhle M. D.C. Activists Want Bowser to Veto Bill That Would Allow Minors to Consent to Vaccines. NPR Dec. 7, 2020.

18 CDC. Contraindications and precautions to commonly used vaccines. May 4, 2021.

19 CDC. COVID-19 Vaccines: Summary Documents for Interim Clinical Considerations. June 1, 2021.

20 Fisher BL. Do You Know How to Recognize A Vaccine Reaction? NVIC Newsletter Aug. 27, 2018.

21 Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA). National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. June 2021.

22 Ault A. 11-Year-Olds Could Receive Vaccines Without Parental Consent in DCMedscape Dec. 24, 2020.

23 English A, Shaw FE, McCauley MM et al. Legal Basis of Consent for Health Care and Vaccination for AdolescentsPediatrics 2008; 121 (Supplement 1): S85-S87.

24 42 U.S.C. United States Code, 2016 edition. Title 42 - The Public Health and Welfare Chapter 6A - Public Health Service. Subchapter XIX - Vaccines. Part 2 - National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Subpart c - ASSURING A SAFER CHILDHOOD VACCINATION PROGRAM IN THE UNITED STATES. Sec. 300aa-26. Vaccine information.

25 CDC. Vaccine Information Statements (VISs): Required Use. July 28, 2020.

26 42 U.S.C. United States Code, 2016 edition. Title 42 - The Public Health and Welfare Chapter 6A - Public Health Service. Subchapter XIX - Vaccines. Part 2 - National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Subpart c - ASSURING A SAFER CHILDHOOD VACCINATION PROGRAM IN THE UNITED STATED STATES Sec. 300aa-25. Recording and reporting of information.

27 MedAlerts. Search the U.S. Government's VAERS Data and Reporting Vaccine Reactions to VAERS.

28 Fisher BL. DIY If Your Doctor Won't Report Vaccine Reactions to VAERSNVIC Newsletter June 2, 2021.

29 Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA). National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. VICP Data & Statistics June 2021. Who Can File A Petition and Filing Deadlines.

30 Family Education and Privacy Act. Title 34: Education.

31 Nunez K. What You Need to Know About Informed ConsentHealthline Oct. 11, 2019.

32 Encyclopedia.com. Nuremberg Code Establishes the Principle of Informed Consent.

33 Komesaroff PA, Parker M. Ethical Aspects of ConsentIssues Magazine March 2009.

34 Otterstrom K. The Legal Right and Responsibilities of a Parent. Lawyers.com Apr. 9, 2015.

35 Findlaw. How Long Do Parents' Legal Obligations to Their Children Continue? Nov. 17, 2018.

36 Fisher BL. The Moral Right to Conscientious, Philosophical and Personal Belief Exemption to Vaccination. Oral and referenced presentation to the National Vaccine Advisory Committee May 2, 1997.

37 Kelley AE, Schochet T, Landry CF. Risk taking and novelty seeking in adolescence: introduction to part I. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004; 1021-1032.

38 Steinberg L. Cognitive and affective development in adolescenceTrends Cogn Sci 2005; 9(2): 69-74.

39 Harvard Mental Health Letter. The adolescent brain: Beyond raging hormonesHarvard Health Publishing Mar. 7, 2011.

40 Blakemore SJ, Robbins TW. Decision-making in the adolescent brainNature Neuroscience 2012; 15: 1184-1191.

41 Steinberg L. Monahan KC. Age Differences in Resistance to Peer InfluenceDev Psychol 2007; 43(6): 1531-1543.

42 Knoll LJ, Magis-Weinberg L, Speekenrbrink M et al. Social Influence on Risk Perception During Adolescence. Psychological Science May 25, 2015.

43 Koleva G. Authoritarian Doctors, Timid Patients, and a Health Care Gridlock. Forbes May 29, 2012.

44 Heath S. Understanding the Power Hierarchy in Patient-Provider RelationshipsPatient EngagementHIT July 23, 2019.

45 Koleva G. Authoritarian Doctors, Timid Patients, and a Health Care Gridlock. Forbes May 29, 2012.

46 Fisher BL. The National Plan to Vaccinate Every AmericanNVIC Newsletter Mar. 21, 2020.

47 NVIC. National Vaccine Information Center Cites "Betrayal" of Consumers by US Supreme Court Giving Total Liability Shield to Big PharmaBusinesswire Feb. 23, 2011.

48 Fisher BL, Parpia R. 2005 PREP Act and 1986 Act Shield Vaccine Manufacturers from LiabilityThe Vaccine Reaction Aug. 10, 2020.

49 Ault A. 11-Year-Olds Could Receive Vaccines Without Parental Consent in DCMedscape Dec. 24, 2020.

50 Ibid.

51 Ibid.

52 United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Oct 19, 2005.

53 Institute of Medicine Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccines. Evaluation of Biologic Mechanisms of Adverse Effects: Increased Susceptibility. Chapter 3 (p. 82). Washington, D.C. The National Academies Press 2012.

54 National Vaccine Information Center. Vaccination: Know the Risks and Failures. 2019.

55 Fisher BL. Why Is Informed Consent to Vaccination a Human Right? National Vaccine Information Center June 28, 2017.